Anders Sand is since September 2019 employed as a postdoctoral researcher at the Division of Speech and Language Pathology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Sweden. He completed his doctoral degree in Psychology in 2016 at Stockholm university.
Anders Sand has worked in many different fields of experimental psychology; using electroencephalography to study attention and emotion, in psycho-acoustics, and social decision making. In his doctoral degree, he focused on attention and psychophysics. The one through-line (since his Bachelor in theoretical philosophy) has been his interest in statistics and inferential reasoning (e.g., Bayesian inferences).
After long periods of teaching research methods and statistics to students in Speech and language pathology (logopeder), Anders Sand is now employed as a postdoc at that Division. He mainly acts as a statistical counsel and is involved in that capacity in different research projects. Anders Sand is also one of the principal drivers of a systematic review on the evidence for the benefits of speech and language therapy for persons with cleft palate ± lip with speech disorders.
If you are a Swedish speaker, you can find recorded lectures on research methods and statistics and workshops for learning R here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LoCHKBLThKefBBR8uQ7ujNYLolFnwl-gti6svTgHLa0/edit?usp=sharing
Samson, I., Lindström, E., Sand, A., Herlitz, A., & Schalling, E. (2021). Larger reported impact of stuttering in teenage females, compared to males – A comparison of teenagers’ result on Overall Assessment of the Speaker’s Experience of Stuttering (OASES). Journal of Fluency Disorders, 67, 105822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2020.105822
Sand, A. (2020). A gentle reminder that mean does not imply modal behavior: Few are in‐group biased in minimal groups. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 61(6), 794–802. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12662
Sand, A., & Nilsson, M. E. (2017). When Perception Trumps Reality: Perceived, Not Objective, Meaning of Primes Drives Stroop Priming. Psychological Science, 28(3), 346–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616684681
Sand, A., & Nilsson, M. E. (2016). Subliminal or not? Comparing null-hypothesis and Bayesian methods for testing subliminal priming. Consciousness and Cognition, 44, 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2016.06.012
Sand, A. (2016). Reversed Priming Effects May Be Driven by Misperception Rather than Subliminal Processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00198
Sand, A., & Nilsson, M. E. (2014). Asymmetric transfer of sound localization learning between indistinguishable interaural cues. Experimental Brain Research, 232(6), 1707–1716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-014-3863-7
Wiens, S., Molapour, T., Overfeld, J., & Sand, A. (2012). High negative valence does not protect emotional event-related potentials from spatial inattention and perceptual load. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 12(1), 151–160. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-011-0072-8
Sand, A., & Wiens, S. (2011). Processing of unattended, simple negative pictures resists perceptual load: NeuroReport, 22(7), 348–352. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e3283463cb1
Wiens, S., Sand, A., Norberg, J., & Andersson, P. (2011). Emotional event-related potentials are reduced if negative pictures presented at fixation are unattended. Neuroscience Letters, 495(3), 178–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2011.03.042
Wiens, S., Sand, A., & Olofsson, J. K. (2011). Nonemotional features suppress early and enhance late emotional electrocortical responses to negative pictures. Biological Psychology, 86(1), 83–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.11.001